![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.mordego.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/BP-AA934_Movie2_B620_20170905153809-1.jpg\")
\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n
They both need an audience to exist.<\/p>\n
What this has to do with what you don\u2019t like is that a lot of auteur filmmakers see other media and ways of expression as inferior or second class.<\/p>\n
Where I want to get to with this statement is that in other to become an \u201cauteur\u201d the thing you have to do is convince the critics. If what you want is to reach your audience because you truly believe it\u2019s out there, what you have to do is, in whatever type of media you find and that you know you can pull of to pass on your message, communicate! That\u2019s what this is all about!<\/p>\n
If the form is a blog like this one, a film, a short, a video clip, a YouTube video, Channel, a book, a novel, a play, a podcast\u2026 WHO CARES?!<\/p>\n
THE POINT HERE IS TO COMMUNICATE!<\/p>\n
So coming back to the title of this post, why would I do something that I don\u2019t like?!<\/p>\n
We\u2019ll the answer to that is quite simple and differentiates a good communicator from a mediocre one. It differentiates a true filmmaker from an \u201cauteur\u201d.<\/p>\n
Let\u2019s be clear on what I mean by an \u201cauteur\u201d. An auteur is someone that in my eyes seems to have a compelling vision on a theme but gets lost in the form of expression. For an auteur the way of saying something is more important than what is said.And that\u2019s fine.<\/p>\n
But how I really structure all my work is in the same way Simon Sinek structures the importance of the how, the what and the why.<\/p>\n
I leave you the video of Simon Sinek on the great importance of the why<\/i> over the what<\/i> and the how<\/i>!<\/p>\n
https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=u4ZoJKF_VuA<\/p>\n
So after knowing why the why<\/i> has and will always have more weight than the what <\/i>and the how,\u00a0<\/i>you can tell why doing \u201cwhat you don\u2019t like\u201d in the domains of the what<\/i> and the how<\/i> are secondary if your why<\/i> is strong enough to find it\u2019s path through a what<\/i> and a how<\/i> that beforehand are not that appealing to you.<\/p>\n
For example, you may not like to do video clips but if your\u00a0why<\/i> is strong enough to put you through the what <\/i>and the how<\/i> then DO IT!<\/p>\n It is the reason why you get up in the morning, that gets you pumped, ready to go, with energy enough to do what has to be done and in the end of the day be sure that you\u2019re finishing what you started.<\/p>\n To sum up, along the way there will come opportunities that you may either take them or you may think that they\u2019re not enough for you because you\u2019re here for something greater… But the truth is that sort of dilemmas don\u2019t have much meaning when it comes to the form\/the way you do it.<\/p>\n The dilemma lies within the why<\/i>. You should think about if what you\u2019re doing and the way in which you do it are compatible with your why. <\/i>If you objectively answer this question, it really doesn\u2019t matter what <\/i>you and how <\/i>you do it, because both of those things change with time and in some kind of way are out of our control.<\/p>\n Think about your why, <\/i>see you next time!<\/p>\nLet me explain how a good why <\/i><\/strong>looks like.<\/strong><\/h3>\n
Control the why<\/i> and you won\u2019t be lost in what<\/i> you \u201chave\u201d to do and how<\/i><\/strong> <\/i>you<\/strong> \u201chave\u201d to do it.<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n
\n\t\t\t\t![\"call-to-action\"](\"https:\/\/www.mordego.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/call-to-action-768x512.png\")
\t\t\t\t<\/a>
\n\t\t\t<\/p>\nSEOTUBE \u2013 The YouTube Skill You Need to Gain Subscribers<\/a><\/h2>\n